2 months ago
Denise Richards’ ex Aaron Phypers has been ordered to salary a California man accusing him of fraud $160,000 successful a default judgement.
A Los Angeles Superior Court judge ordered nan reality prima to make nan costs to Rupert Perry connected March 16 aft he grounded to respond to nan suit successful court, according to tribunal documents viewed by Page Six.
A rep for Phypers did not instantly respond to Page Six’s petition for comment.
Perry made respective attempts to scope Phypers, 53, to make him alert of nan pending suit complete nan past year.
In 2025, nan widower placed respective ads successful nan Malibu Times connected June 19, June 26, July 3 and July 10 letting him cognize that he was being sued successful Los Angeles Superior Court and had 30 days to respond to nan lawsuit filing, per Us Weekly.
However, Phypers recovered himself embroiled successful a heated divorcement conflict pinch his estranged wife, Denise Richards, astir that time.
Want much personage and popular civilization news?
Start your time pinch Page Six Daily.
Thanks for signing up!
The exes are reportedly still duking it retired successful court. In nan astir caller update, Richards was ordered to salary her erstwhile hubby $5,000 a month, arsenic good arsenic $30,000 successful attorney’s fees to spell toward their divorcement proceedings.
He’s besides presently facing criminal charges — 2 felony counts of injuring a spouse and 2 felony counts of dissuading a witnesser by unit aliases threat.
Perry first revenge a suit against Phypers successful November 2024 for breach of oral statement and fraud by mendacious committedness complete payments he and his precocious wife, Elina Katsioula-Beall, made to his now-defunct wellness center, Quantum 360 Club.
According to nan ineligible docs, Perry claimed nan mates paid Phypers $126,000 for stem-cell treatments successful June 2023 successful nan hopes that it would thief Katsioula- Beall — who had been diagnosed pinch sarcoma crab successful 2019 — heal her illness.
Perry alleged that Phypers told nan mates that nan curen would “cure aliases astatine slightest ameliorate” her information and “was truthful assured successful it” that he promised “if it did not work, he would refund to Ms. Katsioula-Beall and Mr. Perry 50 percent of nan money they to him for nan treatment.”
From July until September 2023, she received treatments. But by December, she learned that nan hadn’t worked and her tumors had grown 25 percent wrong nan 3 months since ending her treatments.
Katsioula-Beall past allegedly reached retired to Phypers to show him astir her results and asked for a 50 percent refund of $63,000. However, Perry claims her petition was ignored connected 2 different occasions.
In March 2024, Perry claimed Phypers agreed to refund Katsioula-Beall’s money aft he was reached by a 3rd party.
Katsioula-Beall sent 1 last invoice requesting costs connected March 29 “as she was dying from cancer.” But, her petition was ignored erstwhile again. She died connected May 21, 2024.
On June 28, 2024, “Mr. Perry said pinch Defendant by telephone, who acknowledged nan indebtedness but proffered a bid of excuses for his nonaccomplishment to salary nan $63,000,” sounds nan documents.
