US reporter urges supreme court to halt ruling forcing her to reveal sources or pay $800-a-day fine

Trending 3 weeks ago

More than 2 years ago, a US territory tribunal judge took nan bonzer measurement of holding nan seasoned investigative journalist Catherine Herridge successful civilian contempt, ordering her to salary a steep regular fine of $800 per time unless she reveals her sources for a bid of stories she wrote successful 2017 for Fox News.

Since then, nan lawsuit has slow moved done nan appeals process, with Herridge dealt a bid of defeats. On Tuesday, nan US tribunal of appeals for nan District of Columbia circuit issued a one-sentence ruling denying Herridge’s plea to enactment nan February 2024 ruling holding her successful contempt, an bid made by territory tribunal judge Christopher R Cooper.

With clip moving retired earlier nan good mightiness spell into effect, Herridge’s ineligible squad is attempting 1 much ineligible maneuver to effort to stave disconnected nan penalty. On Friday, Herridge revenge a petition for a stay pinch nan US ultimate court. The petition was revenge by Paul D Clement, a salient appellate lawyer who has besides been retained by Disney to protestation nan Federal Communications Commission’s investigation of nan ABC broadcast The View.

John Roberts, nan ultimate tribunal main justice, responded to Herridge’s petition by issuing a enactment of nan appeals court’s rulings to springiness nan different statement successful nan case, Chinese American intelligence Yanping Chen, until 1 July to record a response.

Press advocates person agelong been extremely worried astir nan convoluted case, which stems from a privateness enactment suit that was revenge by Chen to uncover who mightiness person provided accusation to Herridge astir a US authorities investigation of her inheritance and an acquisition programme she operated successful Virginia. Herridge was not named successful nan lawsuit, but Chen’s lawyers person based on that their customer tin only get justness if nan journalist is compelled to uncover really she obtained accusation astir nan government’s investigation of Chen.

Herridge, who worked astatine CBS News aft leaving Fox, has refused to uncover her sources, believing it to beryllium an abdication of her work arsenic a nationalist information journalist – a position that property state groups person backed. Because location is nary national shield rule protecting journalists from having to uncover their sources, nan lawsuit shows nan susceptible position facing reporters who screen delicate stories pinch nationalist implications.

It’s not clear yet whether Herridge would personally beryllium connected nan hook for nan $800 regular fee, aliases whether her employer astatine nan time, Fox News, could beforehand it.

Seth Stern, main of defense for nan Freedom of nan Press Foundation, expressed optimism that nan ultimate tribunal would return Herridge’s petition seriously.

“The ultimate tribunal should usage this opportunity to make clear that plaintiffs and prosecutors cannot commandeer nan 4th property to thief them build their cases,” he told nan Guardian connected Friday. “Reporter-source confidentiality is nan lifeblood of investigative journalism. Whistleblowers successful a position to expose abuses won’t spot journalists to protect them, and won’t travel forward, if they judge reporters will beryllium threatened pinch financial ruin for not outing them successful court.”

Fox News besides released a connection this week criticizing nan appeals court’s determination to contradict Herridge’s petition to enactment nan contempt fine. “As we person maintained, forcing a journalist to expose a confidential root strikes astatine nan very bosom of nan first amendment and sends a chilling connection to newsrooms successful their expertise to clasp nan powerful accountable,” nan web said. “We scheme to proceed fighting for Catherine Herridge, and nan protected authorities of each journalists crossed nan country.”

There are fewer past precedents for Herridge’s situation.

In 2005, past New York Times newsman Judith Miller spent 85 days successful jail aft refusing to uncover a confidential source. The pursuing year, a conjugation of news organizations paid $750,000 to settee a suit complete reporting connected an investigation of atomic intelligence Wen Ho Lee, a solution that came aft 5 journalists were held successful contempt and ordered to salary a regular interest of $500 until they revealed their sources.

More
Source theguardian.com
theguardian.com