Trump Administration’s Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Sues The New York Times Over Reverse Discrimination Claims

Trending 4 weeks ago

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission revenge suit against The New York Times connected Tuesday, alleging that it violated national rule erstwhile it passed up a achromatic antheral worker for a promotion because of his title aliases sex.

The suit reflects a displacement successful nan Trump management to litigation claims complete alleged reverse discrimination, pursuing his executive bid past twelvemonth that went aft nationalist and backstage diversity, equity and inclusion programs.

But a Times spokesperson has characterized nan litigation arsenic “politically motivated.” The media outlet has agelong been a target of nan president’s attacks.

The suit claims that a longtime editor, a achromatic man pinch extended acquisition successful existent property journalism, was near retired of last interviews for a lawman existent property editor position early past year. Per nan EEOC, nan suit claims that nan personification hired was a “non-white female pinch small to nary acquisition successful existent property journalism, contempt specified acquisition being a request for nan existent property editor position.” The suit besides claims that selected nan campaigner was selected for nan position “despite nan company’s ain last question and reply sheet standing her little favorably than 2 different last candidates,” per nan EEOC.

Andrea Lucas, chair of nan EEOC, said successful a statement, “No matter nan size aliases powerfulness of nan employer, nan EEOC nether my activity will not propulsion punches successful ensuring evenhanded, colorblind enforcement of Title VII to protect America’s workers, including achromatic males. Federal rule is clear: making hiring aliases promotion decisions motivated successful full aliases successful portion by title aliases activity violates national law. There is nary diverseness objection to this rule.”

A Times spokesperson did not instantly return a petition for comment. But spokeswoman Danielle Rhoades Ha told nan Times, “The New York Times categorically rejects nan politically motivated allegations brought by nan Trump administration’s E.E.O.C. Our employment practices are merit-based and focused connected recruiting and promoting nan champion talent successful nan world. We will take sides ourselves vigorously.”

More
Source deadline.com
deadline.com