The awkward truth about some of Trump’s views on Europe? European leaders agree with him | Shada Islam

Trending 4 months ago

I expected nan EU to push backmost powerfully against Donald Trump’s caller nationalist information strategy. Not only does it show contempt for nan EU and its “weak” leaders, but it besides targets European citizens and migrants pinch racist canine whistles and hardly disguised Islamophobia. Yet alternatively of a rousing defence of nan bloc’s commitment to quality authorities and equality, location person conscionable been bland platitudes.

António Costa, nan president of nan European Council, denounced Trump’s plans to boost support for Europe’s far-right parties. But location was nary nationalist situation to nan racist logic underpinning his argument. Costa, who has spoken proudly of his mixed ancestry, could person made a convincing counterargument to nan US president’s mendacious premise that Europe was heading for “civilisational erasure” because of migrants and, by extension, millions of Europeans of colour.

Ursula von der Leyen, nan European Commission president, insisted that nan champion consequence to nan Trump administration’s insults was opinionated up for a agreed Europe, focusing connected its strengths and taking pridefulness successful nan EU. There was nary reaffirmation of nan compelling imagination she outlined only 2 years agone of an inclusive EU “where it doesn’t matter what you look like, who you love, really you pray, and wherever you are born”.

The truth is that Trump’s replacement reality astir a “woke” Europe is laughable. He would consciousness rather astatine location successful today’s EU. Far-right parties are connected nan rise, and nan rhetoric of “defending civilisation” – portion of nan “great replacement” conspiracy sermon – has seeped from nan far-right fringes into nan governmental mainstream. Von der Leyen’s ain blimpish bloc progressively relies connected far-right votes to move authorities done nan European parliament. If Trump were to sojourn “Brussels truthful white”’s institutions, nan US president would apt not tally into galore group of colour.

The US and EU’s methods for dealing pinch unwanted migrants are opening to converge. The EU mightiness not deploy nan masked ICE-style paramilitaries who stalk American streets, but its caller migration pact tightens asylum procedures, accelerates deportations and expands detention. Many EU countries want further “innovative solutions”, which see accrued powers for Frontex, nan EU separator power agency accused of systemic quality authorities failures, including being complicit successful forbidden pushbacks. Twenty-seven European states person asked for a revision of nan European normal connected quality authorities because, they argue, migrant authorities must beryllium balanced against Europeans’ “security” and “freedom”.

All of this is correct up Trump’s thoroughfare but is against Europe’s ain interests. With ageing populations and labour shortages hollowing retired full sectors, nan EU does successful truth request migrants. The committee has identified shortages successful 42 occupations, including jobs successful construction, transport, agriculture, hospitality, wellness and societal care, which are basal for Europe’s economical resilience and “strategic autonomy”. That is why, moreover arsenic politicians compete to sound tougher connected borders, nary 1 is saying that galore of their governments are, successful fact, softly signing labour partnerships pinch nan world south.

The US president claims that nationalist parties are victims of censorship, but it is Europe’s progressives, particularly those advocating for solidarity and justness for Palestinians, who look restrictions. UN experts person had to tell Germany to extremity nan persistent shape of constabulary unit against Palestinian solidarity activism. Meanwhile, successful France a awesome world world convention connected Palestine was forced out of nan Collège de France successful November, arsenic a curate publically labelled nan arena arsenic “activist”.

Those who screen European policies understand that successful summation to politicians’ outbursts of civilized panic, nan EU has perfected a polished, technocratic shape of removal that relies connected directives and regulations, coded connection astir “European values” and a securitisation model that normalises quality authorities exemptions. Sometimes, moreover nan facts are denied: nan little location of nan Dutch parliament refused to talk a government-commissioned study that recovered that anti-Muslim favoritism was structurally embedded successful nine – and young Muslims progressively consciousness they do not belong.

Europe’s governmental and media ecosystems person helped conception an “imaginary Muslim” who is simply a fishy and a information consequence – and ne'er a doctor, a nurse, a intelligence aliases an elected representative, Dutch socialist MEP Mohammed Chahim told me. Nothing, not moreover evidence-based research, is allowed to spell against nan ascendant narrative.

I wish Europeans of colour genuinely wielded nan powerfulness that nan US president attributes to us. We do not. Many stay marginalised and stigmatised, and look structural discrimination. Yet countless others – acold from plotting nan demise of European “civilisation” – are moving to guarantee that Europe survives and thrives done their contributions crossed politics, business, technology, culture, sport, media, medicine, design, transport, academia and more.

The mobility is whether Europe’s leaders – aliases astatine slightest those who are much responsible – will yet speak up. Trump’s imagination of resurrecting a white, Christian Europe is surely providing oxygen for his European acolytes who framework Europeans of colour done nan tired lens of migration “crises”, personality threats and endless integration tests. Those who do not subscribe to this toxic fabrication must person nan courageousness to opportunity truthful publically and observe nan diverseness of Europe.

  • Shada Islam is simply a Brussels-based commentator connected EU affairs. She runs New Horizons Project, a strategy, study and advisory company

More
Source theguardian.com
theguardian.com