Taylor Swift dragged back into Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni’s legal battle as trial nears start date

Taylor Swift has been dragged into Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni’s ineligible feud erstwhile again.

The popular star’s sanction appeared connected a database of questions — which Lively and Baldoni’s ineligible teams worked “collaboratively” to nutrient connected Friday — to beryllium utilized to prime assemblage members for their “It Ends With Us” proceedings successful May.

One of nan galore questions asks: “Do you cognize immoderate of nan pursuing group that you whitethorn perceive from aliases astir complete nan people of nan trial?” according to tribunal documents viewed by Page Six.

Swift’s sanction popped up aft a agelong catalog of different high-profile names who could perchance attest aliases beryllium mentioned astatine trial.

The lawyers besides added notes to inquire if immoderate imaginable jurors person knowledge of celebs for illustration Baldoni, aliases Lively’s hubby Ryan Reynolds, her sister Robyn Lively, aliases respective members of her “It Ends With Us” formed including Hasan Minhaj, Jenny Slate, and writer Colleen Hoover.

In a abstracted update successful nan case, Baldoni’s squad submitted different filing connected Friday petitioning nan tribunal for an hold to reappraisal nan “voluminous overbreadth of Lively’s witnesser and grounds lists” that her ineligible squad revenge successful a associated pretrial bid this week.

“Lively’s lists are presently impractical for some pretrial and proceedings purposes, obscure nan witnesses and exhibits nan Wayfarer Parties will really person to confront, and create reams of unnecessary activity astatine a clip erstwhile nan parties should beryllium focusing their efforts for trial,” nan filing reads.

Baldoni’s attorneys declare nan “Gossip Girl” star, 38, has submitted an abundance of grounds items that person “limited relevance aliases applicable value” and “suggests small favoritism successful position of what mightiness really beryllium admissible astatine trial.”

For example, nan squad alleged that Lively included a nexus to an article astir a Taylor Swift cooky look arsenic good arsenic “a reside Lively made astir her hubby Ryan Reynolds’ committedness to his family” and various pictures of Lively pinch Taylor Swift.

“It is exceptionally improbable Lively would show specified materials, aliases that nan assemblage would summation immoderate penetration from them,” sounds nan doc.

The lawyers are requesting an other week to reappraisal nan 68 exhibits Lively and her ineligible squad person submitted to nan court.

Reps for Lively, Baldoni, and Swift did not instantly respond to Page Six’s petition for comment.

TMZ was nan first to study this news.

As we antecedently reported, Baldoni scored a awesome ineligible triumph successful nan lawsuit earlier this period aft 13 of Lively’s allegations against nan Wayfarer Studios co-founder were dismissed.

The 2 stars expected to look disconnected successful tribunal complete nan 3 remaining claims against Baldoni — breach of contract, retaliation and aiding and abetting successful retaliation — adjacent period aft some sides rejected colony talks.

“We’re very pleased nan Court dismissed each intersexual harassment claims and each declare brought against nan individual defendants,” Baldoni’s squad said of nan ruling successful a connection to Page Six astatine nan time.

“These were very superior allegations, and we are grateful to nan Court for its observant reappraisal of nan facts, rule and voluminous grounds that was provided.”

Lively also addressed nan court’s decision pinch a connection shared via Instagram, saying: “The past point I wanted successful my life was a lawsuit, but I brought this lawsuit because of nan pervasive RETALIATION I faced, and continued to, for privately and professionally asking for a safe moving situation for myself and others.”