1 month ago
Olivia Wilde laughed disconnected trolls comparing her viral reddish carpet look to nan characteristic Gollum from “Lord of nan Rings.”
The character addressed nan disapproval complete her quality during her caller red carpet question and reply pinch SFGate successful an Instagram Story Saturday, intelligibly not letting it fuss her.
Wilde, 42, blamed her different quality connected nan camera’s fisheye lens — which produces distortion owed to its ultra-wide-angle — but besides acknowledged it wasn’t her astir flattering look.
The mother of 2 wrote, “Leave it to your small relative to springiness you nan maximum magnitude of s–t,” pinch a video of her related asking her if she wanted to reside rumors she’s a “resurrected corpse.”
The Instagram Story besides featured a image of her much-talked-about reddish carpet look broadside by broadside pinch a image of Gollum up top.
“Listen that is simply a fisheye lens,” nan “Don’t Worry Darling” head said. “And I admit, is that my champion angle? Was that my best-ever look? No.”
Want much personage and popular civilization news?
Start your time pinch Page Six Daily.
Thanks for signing up!
“It’s a startling image,” she acknowledged. “It’s a fisheye lens. I don’t cognize why I was truthful adjacent to nan camera, I didn’t request to person to be.”
She added pinch a laugh, “That’s not nan truth.”
Wilde past joked, “Do you person immoderate much questions? I’m not dead.”
The character was astatine nan San Francisco International Film Festival connected April 24 to beforehand her caller film, “The Invite.”
While she was subjected to sadistic comments from SFGate’s viral Instagram station of their question and reply pinch her, she besides had fans that came to her defense.
“It’s unflattering lighting and a bad camera lens. She different looks beautiful and is aging gracefully,” one instrumentality tweeted.
“I deliberation it whitethorn person been nan camera settings, aliases a select of whoever took that video. I saw a news clip wherever she didn’t look arsenic bad,” different instrumentality agreed.
