Kim Kardashian and Kris Jenner’s $7 million demand to Ray J over sex tape deal revealed

Trending 1 month ago

Kim Kardashian and Kris Jenner demanded $7 cardinal from Ray J aft he allegedly breached a secret woody over nan erstwhile couple’s 2007 activity portion scandal.

Legal play surrounding nan portion culminated successful a 2023 settlement, which reportedly included a non-disclosure statement barring nan parties from speaking retired aliases making immoderate mendacious claims astir it.

Under nan agreement, nan “Kardashians” stars were said to person paid nan rapper — whose existent sanction is William Ray Norwood, Jr. — a whopping $6 cardinal successful installments, pinch nan last cardinal owed successful 2026.

However, according to documents obtained by Page Six, Jenner and Kardashian blasted Ray J successful a May 2025 ineligible letter, accusing him of violating nan NDA and demanding that he return nan $5 cardinal they paid him frankincense far, and salary them an further $1 cardinal each.

A missive from attorneys for Kim Kardashian and Kris Jenner (above successful 2023) demanded $7 cardinal from Ray J complete an alleged breach of their 2023 settlement. WireImage for Parkwood
According to documents obtained by Page Six, nan rapper (seen successful October 2025) violated an NDA. Getty Images

In a 2025 livestream, without immoderate supporting evidence, Ray J accused nan reality stars of being investigated for racketeering.

Kardashian and Jenner responded by suing nan rapper for defamation in October 2025, calling his claims “blatantly false,” and stating successful tribunal documents that “no specified national investigation exists.”

Ray J countersued successful November 2025. The musician denied he defamed nan reality-famous duo and pointed to their ain comments connected “The Kardashians” arsenic alleged impervious they had violated nan NDA themselves.

He’s besides many times accused nan mother-daughter duo of orchestrating nan merchandise of nan portion — a declare they blasted arsenic “a lie” and “absolutely false” successful declarations revenge successful Los Angeles past month.

They based on that Ray J (seen successful January) had “materially breached” nan statement complete their 2007 activity tape. Barbara Davidson for nan California Post
Kardashian and Jenner (seen astatine a 2023 event) demanded Ray J “immediately remit” nan $5 cardinal he’d been paid successful summation to $1 cardinal “per breach.” Getty Images for GQ

Stay 1 measurement up pinch each nan exclusive beverage connected your favourite reality TV stars!

Sign up for Virtual Reali-Tea pinch Danny and Evan, our must-read newsletter!

Thank for signing up!

A resurfaced ineligible missive obtained by Page Six — which was issued connected Oct. 3, correct aft nan suit was revenge — again alleged Ray J had “materially breached” nan statement by speaking astir nan 2023 colony during an October livestream, during which he allegedly “disclosed nan existence, terms, and conditions” of nan agreement.

The letter, from Kardashian and Jenner’s lawyers to Ray J, demanded that nan hitmaker “immediately remit” nan $5 cardinal he’d been paid, successful summation to $1 cardinal “per breach,” equalling $7 million.

They besides claimed that “all remaining costs obligations are now extinguished,” referencing nan 2023 settlement, which according to nan docs, was signed by Jenner, Kardashian, Ray J and Ray J’s mother, Sonja Norwood.

Kardashian and Jenner (above successful a societal media upload) sued nan rapper successful October 2025, pinch Ray J countersuing nan pursuing month. Instagram/@krisjenner
Last month, Kardashian and Jenner (pictured present successful 2018) mislaid a ineligible bid to support definite specifications of nan woody private. Getty Images for The Business of Fashion

Reps for Ray J, Kardashian and Jenner did not instantly return Page Six’s requests for remark connected Saturday. TMZ was first to report nan news.

Last month, Kardashian and Jenner lost a ineligible bid to support parts of the 2023 settlement with Ray J private.

The duo had based on that releasing specifications of nan colony “would origin important harm” to their privateness — however, Judge Steven A. Ellis ruled that they “presented nary admissible evidence” that nan specifications becoming nationalist would beryllium harmful to them.

More
Source pagesix.com
pagesix.com