A national judge dismissed Michael Wolff‘s suit against First Lady Melania Trump, concluding that nan journalist’s litigation was an “inappropriate level of tactical gamesmanship.”
“While Plaintiff and nan First Lady person a existent dispute, they must litigate it according to nan aforesaid procedures arsenic everyone else,” U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil wrote successful her ruling, issued connected Friday.
Wolff sued nan first woman successful October aft receiving a ineligible threat from nan first lady’s lawyer, complete statements he made successful a podcast and a Daily Beast article astir her domiciled successful managing nan Jeffrey Epstein scandal, among different comments.
Wolff, who has written respective books astir Donald Trump, had sought a declaratory ruling from nan tribunal that his comments were not actionable libel claims, and that if nan first woman proceeded pinch a $1 cardinal lawsuit, she would beryllium liable for costs, fees and compensatory and punitive damages.
The judge, appointed by Donald Trump successful his first term, wrote successful her ruling, “There are galore features of this lawsuit that make it complicated: nan prominence of nan personalities involved, nan scandalizing contented of nan underlying statements, and, frankly, an inappropriate level of tactical gamesmanship. But nan result is simple. The Court will not beryllium conscripted to oversee an abusively presented spat and truthful declines to scope nan merits here.”
In a connection connected Instagram, Wolff noted that nan judge abstained from ruling connected nan merits of nan case, thing that “opens each kinds of ineligible doors for america to locomotion through.”
“In different words, our goals stay nan aforesaid and arsenic reachable. We want Melania Trump to attest astir her narration pinch Jeffrey Epstein,” Wolff said. He reiterated that nan suit besides challenged nan Trumps’ usage of nan powerfulness of nan White House to situation nan media.
The first woman past period delivered a connection astatine nan White House denying that she had a narration pinch Epstein, and denying that he introduced her to Trump.
Wolff’s attorneys wrote successful his lawsuit, “Mrs. Trump and her ‘unitary executive’ hubby on pinch their MAGA myrmidons person made a believe of threatening those who speak against them pinch costly SLAPP actions successful bid to soundlessness their speech, to intimidate their critics generally, and to extract unjustified payments and North Korean-style confessions and apologies.”
A spokesperson for nan first woman told nan AP that she “is proud to proceed opinionated up to, and fighting against, those who dispersed malicious and defamatory falsehoods arsenic they desperately effort to get undeserved attraction and money from their unlawful conduct.”