GM agrees to pay $12.75 million to settle California lawsuit over misuse of customers' driving data

Trending 3 weeks ago
A closeup of overhead buttons successful a car showing nan OnStar logo pinch a greenish parameter light

Smith Collection/gado/Getty Images

Following its settlement pinch nan FTC earlier this twelvemonth complete its sale of drivers' information to brokers, General Motors has now besides reached a settlement successful California. The company agreed to salary $12.75 cardinal successful civilian penalties to settee nan suit led by Attorney General Rob Bonta connected behalf of nan group of California, and is banned from trading driving information to user reporting agencies for 5 years. The lawsuits came aft a 2024 New York Times study revealed that GM collected consumers' driving information done its OnStar programme and sold this accusation to information brokers Verisk Analytics and LexisNexis Risk Solutions, which successful move could marketplace nan information to car insurers.

In immoderate cases, that driving information could beryllium utilized by insurers to summation customers' rates. However, successful California, customers were apt spared this consequence, arsenic laws successful nan authorities prohibit insurers from utilizing driving information successful this way. Nevertheless, nan title alleges that GM violated consumers' privateness by nonconsensually trading information that included people's names, interaction information, geolocation information and driving behaviour data.

The colony statement stipulates that GM must delete immoderate driving information it's retained wrong 180 days "except for definite constricted soul uses," unless it has nan customer's definitive consent. It besides requires GM to create a privateness programme to measure nan risks of collecting information done OnStar, and study its findings to nan DOJ and different agencies. In a connection connected Friday, Bonta said, "Today's colony requires General Motors to wantonness these forbidden practices and underscores nan value of nan information minimization successful California's privateness rule — companies can't conscionable clasp connected to information and usage it later for different purpose."

More
Source engadget.com
engadget.com