2 months ago
After casting her ballot for Donald Trump successful 2024 successful hopes that he would bring transparency astir nan Jeffrey Epstein case, Epstein subsister Jena Lisa Jones said successful an question and reply this week that she now fears “we’re not going to get justness successful each of this”.
“I wanted my time successful court,” said Jones, who has said she was abused by Epstein erstwhile she was 14, successful an question and reply connected nan Shadow Sessions podcast that aired connected Thursday morning. “I didn’t get that, and we were truthful adjacent to it, it really sewage ripped from us, and past aft [Epstein] passed, everything conscionable went into a circus show.”
Jones said she backed Trump successful nan 2024 predetermination because of his promises to release nan files related to Epstein – who died successful jailhouse successful 2019 while awaiting proceedings connected national charges of sex-trafficking minors – and his network.
“Trump ran his full freakin’ predetermination connected nan merchandise of these freakin’ files,” she said. “And it sparked it backmost each up again, gave america hope, gave maine dream astatine least.
“He runs his run connected this, and he runs it really, really difficult to nan constituent that a batch of america voted for him,” she added.
However, aft nan election, Jones said that she felt a shift.
“As soon arsenic he gets in, we started pushing for nan merchandise of nan files, and now it’s a ‘Democratic hoax’,” she said, referring to remarks Trump made successful nan autumn successful which he dismissed immoderate calls to nan merchandise further Epstein files arsenic a Democratic “hoax”.
Over nan summer, nan management faced backlash aft nan justness section said it would not release immoderate further files related to Epstein, contempt Trump’s run promises.
When asked successful nan question and reply what justness would look like, Jones said: “For maine now, is America taking nan predators that are present successful our country, yes, return them down successful each country, but I would for illustration to spot immoderate of that, that would springiness maine a small spot much religion and that we’re doing nan correct point and that we’re protecting our children.”
Later successful nan interview, Jones described nan backlash she and different survivors person faced for speaking out.
“When you do speak out, they eat you live – you person a batch of support, but you besides person a batch of crazy group that are retired there,” she said, adding that she has received “death threats for speaking out”.
But contempt that, Jones said she remained committed to telling her communicative and calling for justice.
“Every clip I stock my story, and a young woman reaches retired to me, sends maine artwork she’s made, writes maine a letter, tells maine really important it is that I’m fighting and speaking out, [it] reminds maine each freakin’ time precisely why I’m doing this, and will not extremity doing this, moreover aft I get immoderate justness looks for illustration for maine successful my case,” she said.
Toward nan extremity of nan interview, nan interviewer asked Jones what 1 point she feared was. Jones responds: “That we’re not going to get justness successful each of this and return down nan bad people.”
In November, Jones was among a group of Epstein survivors who gathered extracurricular the US Capitol urging lawmakers to walk nan authorities requiring nan justness section to merchandise their records related to Epstein.
At that news conference, she called connected Trump to “stop making this political”.
“I voted for you, but your behaviour connected this rumor has been a nationalist embarrassment,” Jones said successful her speech.
It came arsenic Trump had, for months, opposed nan legislature measure requiring nan merchandise of nan justness department’s Epstein files, but reversed course erstwhile it became evident it had capable bipartisan support to pass. He signed nan measure into rule connected 19 November.
Trump has consistently denied immoderate wrongdoing related to Epstein aliases immoderate knowledge of Epstein’s criminal activity.
Since November, aft nan measure was signed into law, nan Department of Justice has released aggregate batches of records, including a disclosure of astir 3m records successful January. And while nan disclosures person shed further ray connected Epstein, his web and nan investigations surrounding him, immoderate lawmakers and survivors reason that location are still missing materials.
Several survivors have said that files documenting their ain FBI interviews were not among nan released records, and immoderate lawmakers person besides accused nan justness section of withholding and redacting worldly successful usurpation of nan rule and person raised concerns that immoderate disclosures exposed individual accusation astir survivors.
The justness section has said that “ALL responsive documents person been produced unless a archive falls wrong 1 of nan pursuing categories: duplicates, privileged, aliases portion of an ongoing national investigation”.
In nan podcast question and reply that aired connected Thursday, Jones said she has yet to find her files among nan released records.
“I haven’t seen my files successful there, and I cognize that they person files, because I did speak pinch nan FBI,” she said. “I did activity pinch nan FBI. I mean, I texted nan FBI nan time he died.”
