Much has been said astir Stephen Colbert‘s May 21 curtain telephone connected The Late Show. In fact, Colbert often jokes astir it connected air. But pinch little than a period to go, nan late-night big sat down pinch nan New York Times for a much superior appraisal of nan show’s finale.
CBS said nan cancellation was “purely a financial determination against a challenging backdrop successful precocious night” but Colbert has frequently pointed out that nan verdict came 2 days aft he called Paramount Global’s $16 cardinal settlement of Donald Trump’s lawsuit a “big fat bribe” connected nan air.
Still, he told nan NYT, he does not want to argue.
“I do not conflict their rationale. I do make jokes astir it. But I besides wholly understand why group would opportunity (A) that doesn’t make consciousness to maine and (B) that seems fishy to me, because nan web did it to themselves.”
The comedian stressed that not arguing astir 1 constituent does not mean different is invalid.
“It’s imaginable that 2 things tin beryllium true. Broadcast tin beryllium successful trouble. They cannot monetize because of things for illustration YouTube, because of nan title of streaming. They’ve sewage nan books, and I do not person immoderate desire to statement them complete what they opportunity their business exemplary is and really it does not activity for them anymore. But little than 2 years earlier they called to say, ‘It’s over,’ they were very eager for maine to beryllium signed for a agelong time. So, thing changed.”
And while that statement whitethorn beryllium bully fodder for comedy, Colbert said he’s not holding onto it arsenic nan show ends.
“I consciousness truthful overmuch amended to beryllium ‘grateful for’ than to beryllium ‘mad about'” nan past 11 years connected CBS.