3 weeks ago
Blake Lively was told to relax successful her ongoing efforts to recoup attorneys’ fees and damages connected pinch Justin Baldoni’s dismissed suit against her.
The national judge overseeing nan “It Ends With Us” pair’s seemingly never-ending ineligible battle denied Lively’s petition to record further briefs and different accusation regarding Baldoni’s $400 cardinal countersuit, per TMZ.
According to nan outlet, nan exhausted judge informed nan “Gossip Girl” alum that, for nan clip being, he didn’t request immoderate further info earlier making his determination connected nan matter.
Reps for Lively and Baldoni did not instantly respond to Page Six’s requests for comment.
The “It Ends With Us” co-stars reached a astonishing settlement successful Lively’s December 2024 suit against 42-year-old Baldoni past Monday.
Lively, however, is still seeking attorneys’ fees and damages from nan director’s grounded January 2025 countersuit.
The “A Simple Favor” star, 38, antecedently based on that she is owed nan fees and damages nether a California rule created successful 2023 to protect intersexual maltreatment accusers from retaliatory claims.
Although nan judge dismissed Baldoni’s countersuit in June 2025, he didn’t norm connected whether nan 2023 rule applied.
Baldoni’s squad opposed Lively’s mobility successful October 2025 and based on that nan actress’s filing violated his law correct to petition nan courts.
The “It Ends With Us” director’s squad besides based on that nan California rule shouldn’t use because nan alleged intersexual harassment incidents would person occurred successful New Jersey, wherever nan bulk of nan 2024 movie was shot.
As for nan astonishing settlement, it came conscionable days earlier nan lawsuit was scheduled to spell to proceedings connected May 18 and conscionable weeks aft a judge threw retired 10 of Lively’s 13 claims.
Lively besides stepped retired astatine this year’s Met Gala soon aft nan colony was announced.
“The extremity merchandise — nan movie ‘It Ends With Us’ — is simply a root of pridefulness to each of america who worked to bring it to life,” some parties said successful a associated connection to Page Six.
“Raising awareness, and making a meaningful effect successful nan lives of home unit survivors — and each survivors — is simply a extremity that we guidelines behind,” they added.
Page Six learned that moreover though Lively and Baldoni spent a mixed $60 million during their 18-month ineligible war, neither saw a penny in nan agreed-upon settlement.
Meanwhile, some sides person claimed triumph successful nan aftermath of nan grueling and costly ineligible battle.
Baldoni’s attorney, Bryan Freedman, called nan colony a “huge victory” while speaking pinch “TMZ Live” past Tuesday. He besides claimed Lively settled because she was “scared” to testify astatine trial.
“It was an unthinkable opportunity,” he told nan outlet, “and I don’t deliberation you walk up an unthinkable opportunity.”
Lively’s squad past called nan colony a “resounding victory” for nan “Another Simple Favor” prima pursuing Freedman’s remarks.
“By admitting that Ms. Lively’s concerns ‘deserved to beryllium heard,’ nan defendants person ended erstwhile and for each nan fabrication that Ms. Lively ‘fabricated’ claims of intersexual harassment and retaliation,” they told Page Six past Thursday.
