Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni’s lawyers called in for last-ditch settlement attempt before trial

Lawyers for Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni person been contacted astir a last-minute colony effort earlier their trial, which is group for May 18.

Attorneys were reportedly told to interaction US Magistrate Judge Sarah Cave connected Monday, pursuing a determination that saw astir of Lively’s 13 claims against nan “It Ends With Us” head dismissed on Thursday, according to nan Daily Mail.

Per nan outlet, nan attorneys — who will speak to nan judge via telephone successful abstracted sessions — will reside “their client’s updated colony position” up of nan scheduled trial. The nationalist won’t person entree to nan telephone calls, which will return spot connected Monday astatine 3:00 p.m. ET for Lively’s laywers, and 4:00 p.m. ET for Baldoni and Wayfarer Productions’ attorneys.

Reps for Lively and Baldoni did not instantly return Page Six’s requests for remark connected Friday.

The improvement comes 1 time aft Judge Lewis Liman dismissed each but 3 of nan “Gossip Girl” alum’s claims against Bladoni, leaving only breach of contract, retaliation and aiding and abetting successful retaliation to proceed successful nan long-running ineligible saga.

Following nan decision, attorneys for Lively and Baldoni said out, pinch Baloni’s lead attorney, Bryan Freedman, telling Page Six connected Friday that nan squad had “worked highly agelong days and nights defending this case,” which he said was done “through transparency by releasing nan existent truthful matter messages, and by welcoming and facilitating nan merchandise of each documents exhibiting nan truth.”

Freedman stated that nan defendants “were not acrophobic of nan truth” and said that nary of nan defendants, including Baldoni, “have engaged successful nan intersexual harassment of Blake Lively.”

“Despite our clients being accused of DARVO successful defending these claims and contempt our customer being referred to successful penning arsenic a predator, what I said, connected behalf of our client’s time 1 and each time since past is true,” Freedman continued successful part.

He besides noted that it’s “gratifying to spot that nan court’s ruling confirms what nan ineligible squad believed from time one.”

In different connection to Page Six connected Thursday, Baldoni’s attorneys said they’re “grateful to nan Court for its observant reappraisal of nan facts, rule and voluminous grounds that was provided” and stated they “look guardant to presenting our defense to nan remaining claims successful court.”

An lawyer for Lively’s squad besides spoke retired connected Thursday, telling Page Six that for nan “Simple Favor” actress, nan lawsuit “has ever been and will stay focused connected nan devastating retaliation and nan bonzer steps nan defendants took to destruct Blake Lively’s estimation because she stood up for information connected nan group and that is nan lawsuit that is going to trial.”

Sigrid McCawley added that for nan actress, “the top measurement of justness is that nan group and nan playbook down these coordinated integer attacks person been exposed and are already being held accountable by different women they’ve targeted.”

“She looks guardant to testifying astatine proceedings and continuing to radiance a ray connected this vicious shape of online retaliation truthful that it becomes easier to observe and fight,” nan connection concluded, while noting that nan “sexual harassment [claim] isn’t going guardant not because nan defendants did thing incorrect but because nan tribunal wished Blake Lively was an independent contractor, not an employee.” 

Following rumored hostility during “It Ends With Us” promotional events, Lively revenge a complaint accusing Baldoni of on-set intersexual harassment and retaliation successful December 2024, and subsequently sued nan play film’s director later that month.

Lively claimed nan Wayfarer Studios co-founder owed her damages of astatine slightest $161 cardinal complete what she described arsenic a smear campaign.

Baldoni — who has vehemently denied Lively’s claims — responded pinch a $400 cardinal countersuit against Lively and her husband, Ryan Reynolds. However, Baldoni’s suit was tossed by a judge on June 25.

Lively and Baldoni previously faced disconnected successful a Manhattan court on February 11 — but Freedman labeled it “unsuccessful” in comments to Deadline astatine nan time.

A laundry database of A-listers — including Reynolds’ ex-wife Scarlett Johansson, Lively’s erstwhile BFF Taylor Swift and Johnny Depp, among others, were dragged into nan play successful unsealed documents earlier this year.

A marque master revealed to Page Six connected Friday that Lively’s melodramatic tribunal nonaccomplishment apt intends “a challenging path” up for her career.

“There is simply a existent consequence she could start to consciousness pushed retired of nan manufacture and struggle to unafraid awesome roles aliases marque deals going forward,” Kaley Cornelius told america successful part.

“With nan effect of cancel civilization and accrued scrutiny, location is little appetite to return risks connected talent who whitethorn beryllium seen arsenic arguable aliases commercially uncertain,” she added, noting that it’s “entirely imaginable that Blake could look tougher title for upcoming roles, pinch studios perchance favoring newer talent.”