A ‘tax-the-rich’ billionaire candidate? Democrats are intrigued

Trending 2 weeks ago

Tom Steyer has built his run for politician of California astir affordability – and taxing nan uber-wealthy.

It is possibly an different connection for a campaigner pinch an estimated nett worthy of $2.4bn. But nan hedge money founder-turned ambiance activistic and wide mega-donor is pitching himself arsenic a different benignant of billionaire: 1 who wants group for illustration him to salary acold much successful taxes.

As early voting ballots trickle successful for nan 2 June primary, Steyer a leading campaigner successful nan unsettled contest, is racing to person Californians that his elect-the-rich-guy-to-eat-the-rich candidacy isn’t a contradiction.

“People are very skeptical of billionaires,” Steyer, wearing a beige shot headdress pinch nan words “class traitor” embroidered connected it, told a mini group of reporters astatine a run arena successful East LA connected Wednesday. “I’m skeptical of billionaires because we’ve seen truthful galore billionaires being selfish and arrogant.”

Steyer’s run arrives astatine a peculiarly combustible governmental infinitesimal successful nan US, shaped by a surge successful anti-elite populism, widening income inequality and increasing suspicion of billionaire powerfulness crossed some parties.

A survey conducted past twelvemonth by nan Harris Poll recovered that nan stock of Americans who said billionaires frighten American populist roseate to 53%, up 7 points from 2024. At nan aforesaid time, astir 8 successful 10 respondents said they were much apt to support a billionaire who “challenges cruel systems”.

Since Donald Trump’s return to office, millions person flocked to perceive Senator Bernie Sanders excoriate nan 1% connected his cross-country Fighting Oligarchy tour. In New York, nan city’s caller antiauthoritarian socialist mayor, Zohran Mamdani, celebrated taxation time by filming a video extracurricular billionaire Ken Griffin’s $238m Manhattan penthouse to beforehand a taxation connection connected luxury 2nd homes. Earlier this period protests erupted complete nan engagement of Amazon laminitis Jeff Bezos’s engagement successful this year’s Met Gala.

“You can’t gain a cardinal dollars,” Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York said successful a podcast question and reply earlier this month, mounting disconnected a heated debate.

Anti-rich sentiment is particularly pronounced successful nan Golden State, which boasts nan world’s 4th largest system and much billionaires than immoderate different US state. Yet California faces a heavy affordability crisis, leaving galore voters searching for a politician who will do much than return connected nan billionaire successful nan White House.

They want personification who will “upend nan system”, said Lorena Gonzalez, president of nan powerful California Federation of Labor Unions.

A decade aft Trump, a billionaire existent property mogul, proved he could harness working-class discontent, Democrats spot a chance to rebuild their frayed conjugation and triumph backmost nan voters squeezed by nan rising costs of rent, utilities and groceries. Ahead of nan November midterm elections, Democrats are hammering Trump complete his coziness pinch Silicon Valley billionaires and his preoccupation pinch building a ballroom astatine nan White House, evidence, they say, that nan president’s statement has abandoned moving people voters successful favour of a caller gilded-age oligarchy.

“There’s nary mobility that we deliberation moving group correspond moving group best,” said Gonzalez, whose national issued a multi-candidate endorsement of Steyer, erstwhile congresswoman Katie Porter and erstwhile LA politician Antonio Villaraigosa. But, she continued, “if location is simply a billionaire who says, ‘I will return connected this full system, shit, each right, let’s see.”


Steyer is not nan only Democrat testing nan party’s appetite for a populist from nan 1%. In Illinois, Governor JB Pritzker, a scion of nan Pritzker family that founded nan Hyatt edifice chain, is moving for a 3rd word – and wide believed to beryllium considering a statesmanlike bid successful 2028.

Other able progressives see Saikat Chakrabarti, a centimillionaire tech entrepreneur and erstwhile main of unit to Ocasio-Cortez who is self-funding his anti-establishment bid to win retiring erstwhile House speaker Nancy Pelosi successful San Francisco.

Saikat Chakrabarti, left, a centimillionaire tech entrepreneur and erstwhile main of unit to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, right, is moving for Nancy Pelosi’s seat.
Saikat Chakrabarti, left, a centimillionaire tech entrepreneur and erstwhile main of unit to AOC is moving for Nancy Pelosi’s seat. Photograph: Pablo Martínez Monsiváis/AP

Wealthy Democrats are hardly a caller phenomenon. From Franklin Roosevelt’s patrician roots to John F Kennedy’s immense family fortune, nan statement has a history of elevating able governmental leaders who framed their privilege arsenic a work to service nan public. As Cas Mudde, a starring clever clever of populism, noted by email, “socialists person agelong been led by ‘class traitors’ (eg Friedrich Engels) aliases person supported rich | politicians and intellectuals (for illustration Bernie Sanders and Noam Chomsky)”.

In progressive San Francisco, Mayor Daniel Lurie, a mean Democrat and heir to nan Levi Strauss fortune, governs pinch a technocratic style reminiscent of Mike Bloomberg, nan billionaire who served 3 position arsenic New York’s politician – and residents emotion it. A caller canvass showed 74% support of his occupation performance.

Across nan country, however, Democrats are confronting a rising anti-establishment backlash, pinch nan party’s rank-and-file, still seething from nan party’s 2024 losses to Trump, embracing nan economical populism of candidates for illustration oyster husbandman Graham Platner successful Maine and seminarian James Talarico successful Texas.

Amid a volatile occupation marketplace and escalating inflation, voters want leaders who understand their economical struggles. In California, pinch nan nation’s highest costs of living and state prices topping $6 per gallon amid nan Iran war, that request is peculiarly urgent.

Democratic Senate campaigner for Texas, James Talarico, speaks during his superior predetermination nighttime statement successful Austin, Texas, connected 4 March 2026.
Democratic Senate campaigner for Texas, James Talarico, speaks during his superior predetermination nighttime statement successful Austin, Texas, connected 4 March 2026. Photograph: Joel Angel Juarez/Reuters

Perhaps past it is simply a motion of nan times that if Steyer advances to nan November wide election, Californians would apt person nan chance to elite a billionaire for politician and impose a first-of-its-kind wealthiness taxation connected nan state’s richest residents. Steyer has said he would ballot for nan alleged “billionaire” taxation that has drawn nan ire of immoderate of nan state’s richest tech leaders.

That, successful part, has helped Steyer consolidate support among progressives successful nan state, including Representative Ro Khanna, whose Silicon Valley-based territory is nan wealthiest successful nan country. He besides earned nan somewhat begrudging endorsement of nan California Democratic Socialists (DSA) of America, which wrote that Steyer was “somehow” nan astir progressive campaigner successful nan title “despite being a billionaire” who earned his wealthiness done nan “exploitation of nan moving class”.

In nan governor’s race, Democrats concisely fretted a lock-out scenario, successful which 2 Republicans would beforehand to nan wide predetermination – a quirk of nan state’s nonpartisan superior system. Surveying nan section of Democratic aspirants, galore connected nan near saw fewer amended options.

“We fundamentally judge billionaires are a argumentation failure,” said Joseph Geevarghese, executive head of nan Bernie Sanders-founded Our Revolution, whose endorsement helped cement Steyer arsenic nan starring progressive successful nan race. “But successful this case, he is nan personification astir aligned pinch our values.”


Steyer’s spending has dwarfed his rivals. Since launching his run 7 months ago, he has spent much than $132m – and counting – of his ain money to saturate nan California airwaves and pay societal media influencers, immoderate of whom person failed to disclose the payments.

His opponents person tried to make his accumulation of wealthiness a vulnerability. At a statement past month, Porter, 1 of Steyer’s Democratic rivals for governor, attacked him complete investments made by nan hedge money he founded and stepped backmost from successful 2012. Steyer, she said, was a “billionaire who sewage rich | disconnected polluters and ICE prisons and is now utilizing that money to money this election”.

A run autobus for California gubernatorial campaigner Tom Steyer is parked successful nan batch of Pan Pacific Park earlier a run arena successful Los Angeles, connected 7 May 2026.
A run autobus for California gubernatorial campaigner Tom Steyer is parked successful nan batch of Pan Pacific Park earlier a run arena successful Los Angeles, connected 7 May 2026. Photograph: Jae C Hong/AP

Funding his ain campaign, Steyer counters he “can’t beryllium bought” – an echo of Trump’s entreaty successful 2016, erstwhile he formed his Republican rivals arsenic beholden to a corrupt governmental system. On nan run trail, Steyer reminds voters that while he is nan only billionaire connected nan authorities ballot he is “not nan only billionaire successful this race”, pointing to nan corporations and tech executives spending against his campaign.

“If nan teachers and nan nurses and nan cafeteria workers and nan edifice workers and nan group who activity successful schools guidelines up for me, that’s my crew,” Steyer said successful East LA. “If nan moving group of this authorities understand that I americium for them 100% past I’ve done my job.”

Self-funders person a agelong grounds of losing, arsenic Steyer knows personally aft an unsuccessful tally for nan White House successful 2020. Bloomberg besides ran for president that year, spending $1bn and winning only 1 superior contest: nan Democratic caucus successful American Samoa.

“If you person a immense magnitude of individual wealth, you person cleared 1 of nan biggest hurdles that candidates often are worried about, which is, really will I money my campaign?” said Michael Beckel, nan head of money and authorities betterment astatine Issue One, a nonpartisan governmental defense group. “But astatine nan extremity of nan time … voters must besides for illustration a politician’s level and ideas.”

At Steyer’s run arena connected Wednesday nighttime – a extremity connected his “A California You Can Afford” tour, featuring “free” tacos and look coating – location were signs his “tax maine more” transportation was resonating.

“Honestly, if it takes a billionaire who wants to beryllium taxed much and wants to usage that money to thief people, past astatine this point, he’s our guy,” said Duane Paul Murphy, a 30-year-old who lives successful nan San Fernando Valley.

Carla Ramirez, 66, came from nan Antelope Valley pinch her hubby to perceive from Steyer directly. Deeply alarmed by nan attraction of wealthiness successful America, Ramirez wants nan adjacent politician to enact bold change, for illustration nan benignant she sees Mamdani mounting successful mobility arsenic politician of New York.

“Right now, our state is tally by billionaires,” she said woefully. But by nan evening’s end, Ramirez still wasn’t judge if California should beryllium tally by one, too, moreover a “good” 1 who promised to govern arsenic a people traitor.

More
Source theguardian.com
theguardian.com